Two movements, "situated learning" and "constructivism", have been
gaining influence on thinking about education and educational research.
In our view, some of the central educational recommendations of these
movements have questionable psychological foundations.
We wish to
compare these recommendations with current empirical knowledge about
effective and ineffective ways to facilitate learning in mathematics and
to reach some conclusions about what are the effective ways.
A number
of the claims that have been advanced as insights from cognitive
psychology are at best highly controversial and at worst directly
contradict known research findings.
As a consequence, some of the
prescriptions for educational reform based on these claims are bound to
lead to inferior educational outcomes and to block alternative methods for improvement that are superior.
John R. Anderson, Lynne M. Reder, and Herbert A. Simon, 'Applications and misapplications of cognitive psychology to mathematics education',
Texas Educational Review 6 (2000)
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire
Aidez-moi à améliorer l'article par vos remarques, critiques, suggestions... Merci beaucoup.