The opposition between child-centered and subject-centered education implies that teaching which focuses on subject matter tends to ignore the feelings, interests, and individuality of the child. Progressivists describe subject-centered instruction as consisting of lecture format, passive listening, mindless drill, and rote learning, and as directed to purely academic problems that have no intrinsic interest for children. The opposition between subject and child implies that focusing on subject matter is equivalent to inhumane and ineffective schooling.
This picture is mere caricature. Observation has shown, on the contrary, that children are more interested by good subject-matter teaching than by an affectively oriented, child-centered classroom. The anti-subject-matter position is essentially anti-intellectual.
The dichotomy between subject and child has too often resulted in failure to teach children the subjects and the skills they need. Such failure cannot under any principled use of language be described as "child-centered."
Return to the main page :
------------------------------------------
This was an excerpt from Hirsch's great book on education :
The Schools We Need
and Why We Don't Have Them.
and Why We Don't Have Them.
Read some extracts (Amazon) :
http://www.amazon.com/Schools-We-Need-Why/dp/0385484577#reader_0385484577
http://www.amazon.com/Schools-We-Need-Why/dp/0385484577#reader_0385484577
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire
Aidez-moi à améliorer l'article par vos remarques, critiques, suggestions... Merci beaucoup.