27 mars 2012

Culturally biased curriculum (Critical Guide, E.D. Hirsch Jr)

   A term current since the 1980s, when the male, European orientation of the school curriculum came under attack. These attacks were successful, and there arose a consensus (with varying degrees of enthusiasm and reluctance in different quarters) that the American public school curriculum should include more about the contributions of women and excluded ethnic groups. At current writing (1995), this accommodative view has come to dominate. 

   The growth of this curricular consensus is fortunate because the function of the common school is to enable all citizens to master, in addition to their home cultures, a shared, school-based culture that allows them to communicate and work together in the public sphere.
   The changing character of this school-based culture is a continual subject for democratic negotiation. 

   It is true that because the distance between home and school cultures is great for some students, mastery of the school-based culture is more difficult for them than for other students. 
   It is wise to take these cultural conditions into account in trying to gauge the real abilities and achievements of such students. (See also "Culturally biased tests," "Individual differences," and "Intellectual capital.") 

Return to the main page : 
This was an excerpt from Hirsch's great book on education :
The Schools We Need 
 and Why We Don't Have Them.
Recension by Richard Askey :  

Aucun commentaire:

Enregistrer un commentaire

Aidez-moi à améliorer l'article par vos remarques, critiques, suggestions... Merci beaucoup.

Follow on Bloglovin

Archives (2011 à 2014)

Vous aimerez peut-être :

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...